TL;DR
Get oils, diffusers and self-care delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A researcher’s report says AI chatbots and voice assistants can help older adults access and understand health information, but their answers can be inaccurate and difficult to spot-check. The recommended approach is informed skepticism: check sources and quality features, avoid sharing identifying details, and do not treat chatbots as a substitute for medical care.
A report published by Medical Xpress says AI chatbots and voice assistants can help older adults find and understand health information, but warns that users should not assume chatbot answers are accurate. The researcher behind the report recommends “informed skepticism”: staying open to the tools while checking their responses and protecting personal information.
The report describes why older adults may turn to AI for health questions: chatbots respond quickly, can explain complex subjects in simpler language and may feel easier to use for sensitive topics than a conversation with another person. They can also offer information while someone is waiting for an appointment. The researcher says these tools may help users feel more involved in managing their health, though they do not replace clinical advice.
A 2025 survey of 300 adults found that about one in five respondents used AI chatbots to ask health questions. In a separate poll conducted by the researcher and colleagues, one in two older adults said they used AI chatbots or voice assistants, and about 14% of that group accessed health information with them. These figures describe the surveys cited in the report; they are not presented as estimates for every older adult.
The report also points to risks: chatbots can give incorrect medical guidance, misclassify conditions or respond in an overly agreeable way, a tendency experts call “sycophancy.” In the 2025 survey of health-chatbot users, four in five said they never verified the chatbot’s output. The researcher notes that older adults in their own work often preferred to start and finish a search on one device, which could make checking an answer through a different source less likely.
How Chatbots Could Shape Health Searches
For older adults managing chronic conditions or new diagnoses, fast explanations can make health information easier to access between appointments. The benefit is access and convenience—not a guarantee that an answer is medically sound. A confident-sounding response may contain errors, and a chatbot may not recognize when symptoms call for urgent care.
The report’s focus on verification matters because a user who accepts an answer without checking it could make decisions based on inaccurate information. The researcher says mainstream chatbot warnings about possible mistakes can be easy to miss, and the survey finding that four in five users did not verify responses suggests that warnings alone may not prompt cross-checking.
Privacy is another concern. According to the report, public chatbot providers may retain prompts to train future models. Avoiding names and other identifying details can reduce the amount of sensitive information shared, although the report does not specify the data policies of individual services.
Products Worth Considering
Levoit Core 400S-P Smart Air Purifier for Large Rooms
OMRON VIVA 360+ Body Composition Monitor and Smart Scale
Withings Body Scan Smart Scale with Segmental Body Composition and ECG, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Research Says About Use
The report challenges the assumption that older adults are uniformly reluctant or inexperienced technology users. It says older people use voice assistants such as Siri and Alexa to ask questions, and that its 2025 poll found use of chatbots or voice assistants among half of surveyed older adults. The poll’s findings provide a snapshot, not proof that all older adults use these tools in the same way.
People may encounter AI through a dedicated chatbot, a health-provider system or AI features embedded in a search engine. The researcher says those routes can affect whether users notice that a response is AI-generated and whether they continue to other sources. The report gives Google Search as an example of a service that displays an AI summary and says adding “-ai” to a query can remove AI content from its results. Search features and controls may change over time.
The report also cites the Aging with AI Act, introduced in the U.S. Senate in 2026, as an example of growing attention to research on AI’s benefits and risks for older adults. It does not provide details on the bill’s progress or describe it as enacted law.
““The most productive way of engaging with health information generated by an AI chatbot is from a position of informed skepticism.””
— The researcher whose work is described in the Medical Xpress report
Limits of the Available Evidence
The report cites surveys and the researcher’s own work, but the source material does not give enough methodological detail to establish how representative the findings are of older adults across the United States or other countries. The figures should be read as results from the cited surveys, not as universal rates.
It is also unclear how often older users act on chatbot health advice, which types of questions are most likely to lead to harm, or whether verification guidance changes behavior. The report does not compare the accuracy of specific chatbot products, and it does not establish that AI use improves health outcomes or replaces access to clinicians.
Privacy practices differ among services and can change. The report’s general warning about prompt retention does not establish what any particular provider stores, for how long, or how its data settings apply to an individual user.
Practical Checks for Chatbot Users
The researcher recommends learning how to turn off or avoid AI features when that better suits a search, particularly for sensitive topics. Users should also look for a chatbot’s information-quality features, such as sources or links, and compare health answers with reliable published information rather than relying on a single response. The report excerpt ends while introducing this guidance, so it does not provide a complete list of the recommended features.
For health decisions, users can treat a chatbot as a starting point for questions to raise with a health professional—not as a diagnosis or emergency service. They should avoid entering personally identifying information into public tools and seek professional guidance for symptoms or treatment decisions. The report does not announce a specific follow-up study or policy milestone; further research and any progress on the Aging with AI Act remain developments to watch.
Key Questions
Can older adults use chatbots for health information?
They can use them to get quick explanations or prepare questions, according to the report. Chatbot responses can be wrong, so they should not be treated as a diagnosis or a replacement for professional medical advice.
What does “informed skepticism” mean?
It means remaining open to AI tools while checking the quality and credibility of their answers, including consulting sources beyond the chatbot.
How common was health-related chatbot use in the surveys?
In a 2025 survey of 300 adults, about one in five said they used AI chatbots for health questions. A separate poll found that about 14% of older adults who used chatbots or voice assistants accessed health information with them.
What are the main risks?
The report identifies inaccurate advice, misclassification of health conditions, overly agreeable responses and privacy concerns. Public chatbot providers may retain prompts, so the researcher recommends avoiding personally identifiable information.
Should a chatbot answer guide an urgent medical decision?
No. The report warns that chatbots can give incorrect advice in medical emergencies. Users should seek appropriate medical care rather than rely on a chatbot for urgent symptoms.
Source: medicalxpress.com
